| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. Spying on the test server - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Raivi wrote: This is quite different from thrown matches. If they actually interfere with your testing (with more than attempts at passive observation) then they should get banned but I have a hard time believing that passive observation should...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2012.05.18 12:53:00
|
2. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
sevyn nine wrote: Humphrey Goff wrote: sevyn nine wrote: I wouldn't expect you to understand, but there comes a point to where your chances of you winning are close enough to 0 that you need to explore other possibilities. How does t...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2012.05.18 06:42:00
|
3. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
sevyn nine wrote: I wouldn't expect you to understand, but there comes a point to where your chances of you winning are close enough to 0 that you need to explore other possibilities. How does that make you more valiant than Wild Boars/CO2?
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2012.05.17 21:11:00
|
4. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
sevyn nine wrote: Humphrey Goff wrote: I have no grudge, but you do know that Razor was one of the teams doing the bracket manipulation last year right? .... Our hand was forced, and it sucked. Thanks for all the letters, simple ye...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2012.05.15 18:24:00
|
5. Shouldn't the semi-finalists of AT9 get automatically be qualified for AT10? - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Matze reloaded wrote: Nevertheless this change of rules is definitely not fair towards Darkside and Razor, especially since this was a promised reward from AT IX. I have no grudge, but you do know that Razor was one of the teams doing the b...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2012.05.14 20:41:00
|
6. Alliance Tournament 9 - The Hydra and 0utbreak Perspective - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Lazerus Bulder wow almost 261 post about how great you are. LOL No matter how you all packet it, or how many of your buddies/alts you get to post in here, you did not win a PvP tournament in my book. You won the scammin...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.06.21 22:01:00
|
7. Thanks - in EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion [original thread]
\O/ CCP \O/ Good AT.
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.06.06 10:48:00
|
8. Shortcut problems (broadcasting targets) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
A. You dont have a job you moron. B. Thats not what i told you to write!
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.05.22 16:25:00
|
9. Shortcut problems (broadcasting targets) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Humphrey Goff on 22/05/2011 14:47:12 Edited by: Humphrey Goff on 22/05/2011 14:46:56 Hi, Pre-post whine (dont read if you hate whiners, sorry but steam is best kept outside :-D ): The new meta key system is complete and utter *...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.05.22 14:34:00
|
10. Prisons in EVE - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is a really good idea, also makes room for a new commodity: "Shower room soap".
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.03.21 19:47:00
|
11. New Dev Blog: To click or not to click, that's the pressing question - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Edited by: Humphrey Goff on 27/02/2011 15:54:57 Quote: And this WILL NOT WORK: X. Click the item in space, or its locked target icon, and THEN press W. Stop whining and fix it. I hate when developers get sensitive when their "fea...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2011.02.27 15:54:00
|
12. Which Phobos fitting? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
If you only fly gallente and you like pink. [Phobos, Sniping] Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Magnetic Field Stabilizer II Tracking Enhancer II Tracking Enhancer II Nanofiber Internal Structure II Tracking Computer I...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.06.16 10:08:00
|
13. Typhoon with Lasers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Enden Assulu Edited by: Enden Assulu on 31/05/2009 16:27:17 Am I the only one who runs out of cap boosters :( To be completely fair, of course it matters a little, especially for pos bashing and so on. But for most ...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.06.01 09:56:00
|
14. Typhoon with Lasers? - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
God damn, Beams use to much grid to fit. But 425mm Rails are on par with 1200mm arty damage wise, and have alot better range. Tracking is worse for the 425's though (will miss the tracking bonus from the mega). The problem here is that the desi...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.31 16:22:00
|
15. dron recall button - after d/c or for lost/ forgotten drons - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hi, Ive often used a ishtar with sentries (<120km range). What you do is basically to deploy the drones and then keep yourself safe while target painting and/or maybe shoot a little with spike ammo. A reconnect button would give massive tacti...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.30 21:12:00
|
16. Scimitar - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Originally by: Grista Seconding the small gang support role of the Scimitar. However, there is no reason to ever use an Onerios over a Guardian. With an AB fit, the Oneiros is able to perma run 4 large reps by itself and have ECCM, wi...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.26 19:44:00
|
17. SBs buffed- check. Nag updated- check. Blasters reviewed?... - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: NightmareX Lasers isn't more important than 3 other weapon systems. Just make the Lasers to be more balanced to the 3 other weapon systems instead. Problem solved then . There is some truth in this. The problem is also...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.21 09:56:00
|
18. What is the plan with Lasers/Amarr - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: emf Hehe, I thought this was a THE AMARR PROBLEM thread before I read the OP... It was fine then and it's fine now. Yeah, my fear was that it would turn into that, thanks for pointing out btw. :) I have no issue with tr...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.07 16:03:00
|
19. What is the plan with Lasers/Amarr - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina It has been commented by a dev that "the blaster issue is being looked into". Rgr, thanks.
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.07 12:15:00
|
20. What is the plan with Lasers/Amarr - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Murina In most reasonably minded ppls opinion its the other systems like blasters and AC (especially BS sized) that need adjusting to be more effective, rather than nerfing lasers as nerfing lasers will not fix the issues ...
- by Humphrey Goff - at 2009.05.07 12:04:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |